The palace letters : the Queen, the governor-general, and the plot to dismiss Gough Whitlam / Jenny Hocking ; foreword by Malcolm Turnbull.

By: Hocking, Jenny [author.]Contributor(s): Turnbull, Malcolm, 1954- [writer of foreword.]Material type: TextTextPublisher: Brunswick, Victoria : Scribe, 2020Copyright date: ©2020Description: xvi, 265 pages, 8 unnumbered pages of plates : illustrations, facsimiles, portraits ; 24 cmContent type: text | still image Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9781922310248; 9781913348472Subject(s): Hocking, Jenny -- Trials, litigation, etc | Kerr, John, Sir, 1914-1991 -- Correspondence | National Archives of Australia | Archives -- Law and legislation -- Australia | Freedom of information -- Australia | Conspiracies -- AustraliaDDC classification: 344.94092 Summary: What role did the queen play in the governor-general Sir John Kerr's plans to dismiss prime minister Gough Whitlam in 1975, which unleashed one of the most divisive episodes in Australia's political history? And why weren't we told? Under the cover of being designated as private correspondence, the letters between the queen and the governor-general about the dismissal have been locked away for decades in the National Archives of Australia, and embargoed by the queen potentially forever. This ruse has furthered the fiction that the queen and the Palace had no warning of or role in Kerr's actions. In the face of this, Professor Jenny Hocking embarked on a four-year legal battle to force the Archives to release the letters. In 2015, she mounted a crowd-funded campaign, securing a stellar pro bono team that took her case all the way to the High Court of Australia. Now, drawing on never-before-published material from Kerr's archives and her submissions to the court, Hocking traces the collusion and deception behind the dismissal, and charts the private role of High Court judges, the queen's private secretary, and the leader of the opposition, Malcolm Fraser, in Kerr's actions, and the prior knowledge of the queen and Prince Charles. Hocking also reveals the obstruction, intrigue, and duplicity she faced, raising disturbing questions about the role of the National Archives in preventing access to its own historical material and in enforcing royal secrecy over its documents.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
wnor- Book Northam
Northam Adult Nonfiction
344.94092 HOC (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 31111080154600

Includes bibliographical references.

What role did the queen play in the governor-general Sir John Kerr's plans to dismiss prime minister Gough Whitlam in 1975, which unleashed one of the most divisive episodes in Australia's political history? And why weren't we told? Under the cover of being designated as private correspondence, the letters between the queen and the governor-general about the dismissal have been locked away for decades in the National Archives of Australia, and embargoed by the queen potentially forever. This ruse has furthered the fiction that the queen and the Palace had no warning of or role in Kerr's actions. In the face of this, Professor Jenny Hocking embarked on a four-year legal battle to force the Archives to release the letters. In 2015, she mounted a crowd-funded campaign, securing a stellar pro bono team that took her case all the way to the High Court of Australia. Now, drawing on never-before-published material from Kerr's archives and her submissions to the court, Hocking traces the collusion and deception behind the dismissal, and charts the private role of High Court judges, the queen's private secretary, and the leader of the opposition, Malcolm Fraser, in Kerr's actions, and the prior knowledge of the queen and Prince Charles. Hocking also reveals the obstruction, intrigue, and duplicity she faced, raising disturbing questions about the role of the National Archives in preventing access to its own historical material and in enforcing royal secrecy over its documents.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.